An Argument for the Use of Due :: essays papers

An Argument for the Use of Due Due to a deprivation of attention or understanding of English grammar, many Americans have, for several generations, utilize the adjective due as part of a prepositional explicate to introduce adverbial elements- to the disapproval of some strict grammarians. Although I privilege their prescription, for reasons of style, I must oppose their claim to correctness, on the pragmatic curtilage of logic and sensibility. The most shakily grounded argument against the adverbial use is unmatchable of etiquette or style. Wilson Follett considers this use as poor workmanship which is loose and lawless....r are in writers other than those who take advantage of each latitude. (Follett). H. W. Fowler also reveals a disallow bias in his statement that due to is often used by illiterates ( Qtd. in Morris). But, as Bergen Evans said, it is used to qualify a verb millions of times every day. And it is used in this way in very respectable places. So, if we are to devise and enforce laws of grammar based on tradition by a particular social class or the preference of some who turn away of its workmanship-who I might add are a minority-then we should sharpen our pencils, and organize our oratories, for the battle weve begun hardly ends with this issue and is certain to be long and arduous. A second argument, best stated by Follett, that not every verbal expression is right by virtue of its existence, appears to highlight the noble defense of spoken communication from the deterioration caused by unskilled and uncouth use. If this were the case here, I would cordially applaud Follett and Fowler for their defense. But it is not the case. For example, engraved tablets adorning the Philadelphia state house read, here sat the Continental Congress...except when...it sat in Baltimore, and in...Lancaster and in...York, due to the temporary business line of Philadelphia by the British army. (Qtd. In Evans). And in 1957 Queen Eliz abeth II receptive her addressed of the Canadian parliment with, Due to inability to market their grain, prairie farmers have been confront for some time with a shortage of sums... (qtd. In Morris). The wide spread, globe and formal use of due to for adverbial elements hardly qualifies it as uneducated or uncouth and actually contradicts the definition of locution. In fact, if precise usage is the issue, I think it would be more accurate to call the grammarians commuting of other phrases in adverbial uses a locution.