'How Accurate Is It To Describe The Government Between 1822-30 As Liberal Tories? Essay\r'

'When we use the word vainglorious, its intended implication is open to opinion. The person or group is very(prenominal) open-minded and open to change. The Tories during 1822-30 appeargond to be very noble at this clock time. They appeared to be changing their minds on a number of issues, such(prenominal) as Religious isolateddom, policy-making Rights and dethaw handle. They overly appeared to be changing their attitudes active mess’s freedom of expression. The Six Acts, realised to clog people grouping together, in fear of a revolution. This Act was abolished as the masses appeared to be subject matter with life, and not in an uproar with the soil.\r\nThe Tories appeared to be braggy with the supposed arrival of late men into the Cabinet. ennoble Goderich was introduced as Chancellor of the exchequer. William Huskisson became President of the Board of Trade. With George Canning excessively becoming Foreign Secretary. These peeled men brought with them in the altogether ideas and propositions to the House of Commons. Compared to the previous men they appeared brilliant. however the fair play was these men were not new at all. They were simply back-benchers from the Cabinet, rarely seen doing anything.\r\nThey were brought forward into the main Cabinet in order to please the people. Compared to the old Cabinet they were nought new, but to the people they appeared radical and open to change. genuinely it was well(p) their better ability of conveying ideas to the Commons, which do them appear brilliant. All their supposed new ideas were also nothing new. They were all ideas that had been thought up geezerhood ago, from the years of Pitt. These ideas were postponed due to war or scotch crisis, and the new Cabinet simply set the thumping rolling over again.\r\nOn the Economic side of things, a lot changed. The Corn Laws were placed on a sliding scale by 1828, ensuring cheaper food prices for all. Duties on backing relaxed. With reduced costs for materials, it paved the route for wage increases in the workplace. With depressioner taxes, foreign countries were relieve oneself to trade with Britain. Compared to the previous Protectionism trade of previous years, this appeared out-and-out(a) Free Trade. And with the Reciprocity of Duties Act and relaxation of the water travel Acts, trade seemed to be booming. But these changes weren’t altogether Liberal. The sliding scaled for the Corn Laws may befool reduced the cost of corn, costs remained high. Rather that 80s a quarter, it was reduced to 70s.\r\nIt may hold seemed to be pavage the way to new, cheaper living, but very little changed. Although trade was rather free, compared to previous years, it hitherto remained tightly controlled. Free Trade totally appeared in order to emolument the administration, not in order to help the people. The Exchequer received increased income from the heightened trade. But most importantly it reduced t he increasing fuss of smuggling, which was a ample problem during the times of high taxation in trade. The cheaper costs of materials for factories and other such workplaces, did not create the wage increases expected. People be quiet suffered with a low wage and poor living conditions.\r\nSocially the country experienced great change. The Penal Code was rewritten. Sentences for crimes were lessened, to procure the Law was easily enforceable. Previously many people were seen not guilty due to the high penalization of death for such minor offences such as stealing. The Gaols Act cleaned up the prisons of the country. Trade Unions were once again legal, and allowed people to discuss disputes with their manager over items such as pay and work hours. But these Trade Unions were not allowed to strike, thus making them rather powerless. much(prenominal) reforms in the Penal code and new Acts such as Gaols, were in fact not new at all. They were all thought up during the time of the Napoleonic Wars, and were placed on the back-burner of giving medicational issues. But with the â€Å"new” group of people in Cabinet, now was the time to pass these changes.\r\nPolitically little changed. nonentity was changed about the electoral system itself except for Grampound. In 1821 Grampound was disenfranchised. It lost its MPs because it was a rotten-borough. The seating area were go to Leeds by the House of Commons. Leeds being a ample industrial city. But the House of Lords intervened and forced the seats to go to Yorkshire instead, where they knew on that point would be little immunity from the people. This goes to show that despite all changes the House of Lords still had overall power in the Government. Ironic since they are the unaccompanied ones who are not voted into Parliament. Lord pot Russell gets 164 votes for his reform Bill but the Commons still opposed to the proposition, believing that the people were content with what they had and that th ere was no need for reform.\r\nReligiously nothing would suck happened if it wasn’t for Daniel O’Connell. If he had not win the vote in the bi-election, despite him being a Catholic, this would not have happened. In 1829 Catholic freedom was finally allowed, which gave the Catholics and Non-Conformists the same rights as Protestants in the country. The Government only allowed it due to the fear of rebellion in Ireland, which they could not allow no matter what. alike the Test of Corporations was repealed in 1828.\r\nIn conclusion the Liberal Tories were in fact the same as they had been in previous years. They were no more Liberal than before. The only reason the appeared Liberal was due to the apparent new men on the Cabinet, whose ability to speak considerably in the Commons, made them appear very liberal. around all ideas they brought forward had been created in the days of Pitt. They just re-ignited the flame and set the ball rolling again.\r\nThe only things that may have appeared very Liberal would have been the passing of Catholic Emancipation and the idea of Free Trade. But these two ideas were only created to appease problems the Government faced. The uprising and possible rebellion in Ireland forced them to pass Catholic Emancipation. While the increasing problem of smuggling and evasion of trade duties, meant the Government necessitate to relax the laws on trading. Also compared to the Whig Reformers of 1830-41, they could not possibly be called Liberal Tories\r\n'