Comparison of Lao-tzu and Machiavelli Essays -- Political Philosophers

Comparison of Lao-tzu and MachiavelliLao-tzu and Machiavelli atomic number 18 political philosophers writingin two contrastive lands and two different times. Lao-tzu wasan ancient Chinese philosopher from 6th century BC, the reason of Tao-te Ching, and Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who lived 2000 years after Lao-tzus time,author of Prince. They ar two philosophers but have totally different perspective on how to be a good leader. While both philosophers writing is instructive. Lao-tzus advice issues from detached view of a universal ruler Machiavellis advice is truly personal perhaps demanding. Both philosophers idea will not scarper for todays world, because that modern world is not as consummate(a) as Lao-tzu described in Tao-te Ching, and not as chaotic as Machiavelli illustrated in Prince. Perhaps Lao-tzu and Machivellis political system will not work for todays world, but some of their philosophies are nonetheless exist in some of modern issues. One of those iss ues is gun control, which has sustain a dividing line in America. Lao-tzu advised in Tao-te Ching weapon are the tools of violence all decent man detest them. Weapon are the tools of fear a decent man will avoid them save in the direst necessity and, if compelled, will use them only with the utmost restraint. On the other hand Machiavelli wrote in Prince, Francesco Sforza became Duke of Milan from being a private citizen because he was armed his sons, since they avoided the inconveniences of arms, bec...