'“London 1802” vs “Douglass” Essay Essay\r'

' doneout the centuries, there bring forth been an infinite process out of literary works scripted by a sea of authors that write a variety of genres. exclusively of these works atomic number 18 precious in their give way, and evening if their theme is similar to that of another, the author ever so ads a bit of his/her own flare in order to make said literary initiation unique in some way. William Wordsworth’s â€Å"capital of the United Kingdom 1802” and Paul Laurence Dunbar’s â€Å"Douglass”, although quite similar in form and sentence structure, do add their own flare through the use of specific details. Through the use of these devices, the verbalizers show their disgust for the mephistophelian workings humans do and attempt to change them. take in is a very important aspect of literature. cardinal â€Å"London 1802” and â€Å"Douglass” are sonnets therefore hinting that the work pull up stakes be very a lot a sedate t opic, which as the ratifier continues, is proven to be true. The hoarfrost scheme apply in the first two quatrains is similar in two sonnets.\r\nThe get quatrain and couplet, however, are different in rhyme. In â€Å"Douglass”, the first quatrain is used to tell this person of the evil that is occurring in that time, and how even his wildest nightmares could never measure up to that is now cosmos done whereas in the first quatrain written in â€Å"London 1802” is used to describe the place and what it is a corresponding at the time. In the second quatrain, the loudspeaker system believes as if he truly believes that the presence of this man to whom he writes could change the evil that is occurring. â€Å"Douglass” on the other hand, describes what the home he is in is like. Although each speaker approaches this in a different manner, the supreme goal of two is to shed light on the wrong doing of humans. another(prenominal) device used by both speakers both similarly and differently is sentence structure. On both, the last six eviscerate of productss compose one sentence. This sentence in â€Å"Douglass” is used to ask for guidance and comfort from Fredrick Douglass however, this happens in the second sentence in the sonnet â€Å"London, 1802”. Dunbar’s purpose for making the last sentence nigh Douglass ability to â€Å"guide the shivering bark” ( Dunbar line 12) is to give the reader a sense of repulsion, like his own repulsion and therefore encouraging the reader to change.\r\nThe last sentence in Wordsworth’s poem, on the other hand, is used to praise John Milton. This leaves the reader with the impression that Milton was in fact a heavy(p) man, and that we should strive in order to die more(prenominal) like the person. Even though they are written in different sentences, the fact that this is even mentioned at all suggests that man kind has become execrable and although they are expr essed in different manners, it is go on that the eventual goal of these speakers is to make the readers change. There are specific details used throughout both sonnets that, once again, help to reveal the speaker’s ultimate purpose. First, the way the speakers begin both poems is completely different. Wordsworth commences in a pace of urgency and forcefulness by reflection â€Å"Milton! thou shouldst be living at this hour:” (Wordsworth line 1).\r\nThis makes the reader excited slightly reading the rest of the poem and also, adds interest to the work. Dunbar, however, takes a more meditative approach by saying â€Å"Ah, Douglass, we have fall‘n on evil days.” (Dunbar line 1). This, although not as exciting as the previous example, is also effective in grabbing financial aid because it leaves the reader wondering what it is that could be inspiring such(prenominal) deep thought while still, clearly stating his position. The speaker in this poem also sa ys â€Å"Give us comfort through the lonely dark” (line 14). This line makes the reader believe that there is still hope in humanity. All we get hold of is comforting from the loathsome world and we can become better people. We have the qualities that make for decent citizens, we just no seven-day show them. Wordsworth, however, shows no sympathy nor hope for humanity.\r\nHe states â€Å"Oh! Raise us up, re secrete to us again; and give us manners, virtue, freedom, power” (Wordsworth line 8). This suggests that Wordsworth has missed all hope in humanity and believes that the qualities that make for decent people are lost. People need someone to show them the qualities that make for good people, they need to be shown. Although both speakers believe that humanity is brutal and abominable, the way they perceive the solution is obviously much different.\r\nWith the devices used throughout both poems, it is apparent that decree needs to change in order to become bet ter. The way things are is absolutely horrendous and by no means is it suitable for living in. Although both poems express similar ideals, the state of mind of the speaker is clearly much different, and the way to go virtually fixing society is also much different. Because the devices and tone used throughout both poems was different, it in turn made their works of literature truly a one-of-a-kind.\r\n'