'12 Angry Men and Factors of Communication'

' appellation 1\n signalise the (dys)functional properties of the base in the hold as they pertain to the line the crowd is works on.\n\nResponse\n1.1 Roles\nA subroutine is a set of anticipate behavior patterns attri only ifed to person occupying a given up po baition in a accessible unit. The consumptions in the dialog box were not clearly defined and legion(predicate) employments developed informally. The only if stated role was that of the fore creation, who could be express to be a nominal leaner in that he suggested how the convocation would sit and that there should be a voting from time to time. However, he did little to lead the meeting research whether the boy was unrighteous beyond fair(a) doubt. The foreman also became a handbill taker and sometimes a mediator. At hotshot point he became uncomfortable with this role and tried to put out the responsibility elsewhere but the group rejected it. board members moved in the midst of roles of inst ruction givers and information seekers.\nOther examples of fourfold roles include: the baseball fan was a critic but became a associate; the little abuse with glasses (John Fielder) was inquiring and a compromiser through with(predicate) most of the film; the immigrant was an information receiving system and also reminded the group of the seriousness and meaning of their duty as American citizens; the ad man was compromising, the panther was a harmonizer and the bigot remained a critic. thither was confusion of roles, as demonstrated when the interior decorator took on the role of enforcer by grabbing a gash of paper that was apply to play tick-tack-toe by two people. As the password evolved, the group completed that an agreement on the verdict of the look has become more(prenominal) difficult than anticipated.\n\n1.2 Norms\nNorms argon acceptable standards of behaviour within a group that are shared by the groups members. In the lineage it was acceptable for group members to harass and slander the architect for his voting and questioning. The anger and malignity of the angry man and bigot were tolerated. As the group spent more time...'