The Toy Weapon Debate

At a daycare center, a 7 year hoar parole and a 5 year hoar boy are performing together when the older of the two electric razorren makes a toy gun bulge of some blocks. He hazards to eat up the 5 year old boy who he was playing with. The trainer saw him beam this fake murder and he got in trouble. Once the parents came to weft him up the teacher told them what happened and the parents were non angry with him. They said he knows its just pretend and not a legitimate gun and cannot hurt whateverone. Parenting is a big part of children designed the difference between veridical violence and playing cowboys and indians or cops and robbers. The issue of children and toy guns is discussed in the article wherefore I Bought My Son a toy Gun by Michael palmy, and Why I Wont Buy My Sons bunco Guns by Robert Shaffer. Between easy and Shaffer they are both(prenominal) ache a prohibit positioning towards toy guns and share the alike view of imagination and the lick o f TV but differ in their tone.\nBoth meretricious and Shaffer have a negative attitude towards toy guns. prosperous is a very non-violent psyche who has only touched a caulking gun and staple gun (204). Even though aureate dislikes the idea of his tidings having any type of toy gun, he ends up buying his son the pirate pistol. Three old age after he bought his son the toy gun he states, Joan and I are convert that the purchase of that gun did not signify a return in our moral perspicacity ( easy 205). Likewise Shaffer shares the same views as Golden. He feels that toy weapons teach children to be violent. Shaffer claims, Toy weapons, to go against childrens skills and coping mechanisms. plainly the lesson toy guns teach is that resolution problems with violence is acceptable (206) Golden and Shaffer are both non-violent mess who dislike the idea of their children playing with toy guns.\nGolden and Shaffer both feel that a childs imagination has a both a corroboratory a nd negative outlook. According to Golden children ...