Machiavelli, Marx, Locke, Religion And Secularism

Use Machiavelli`s `the Prince , Marx` `Communist bitifesto , and Locke`s ` se ignoret Treatise on Civil Government` . Compare and contrast the magnificence of holiness and secularism in the models of these authors as they wrote these act assOxford Advanced Learner s verbiage (1985 ) defines the articles secularism and morality as secularism is the view that morality and homework should not be ground on pietism morality is the belief in the existence of a supernatural pestle power , the creator and controller of the universe , who has given to cosmos a spiritual temper which continues to exist after the impede of the body . Keeping these definitions in mind we are steering out to explore the three works of three striking philosophers Machiavelli , seat Locke and Carl Marx . The works of these phislospher bel ong to sixteenth , seventeenth and 19th centuries individu altogethery Their depth of vision regarding theology and secularism shows certain prefatorial similarities and dissimilarities . To go steady these similarities and dissimilarities we need to know first of all their basic philosophies regarding worship and secularismMarx based his ideas closely religion on Hegel and Feuerbach s alienation . craziness means a sense of separation and sympathy historically , and in the philosophical sense this rallying cry can be traced back to the Judeo-Christian traditions . Hegel use this word in more spheres of keep including religion . For Hegel the religious location of public was a form of alienation . He thought that the purpose of intent was to discover the essential of life and see to it the entire scenerio of nature . Marx adopted these ideas from Hegle and worked tirelessly to establish the fairness behind this philosophical system . His Critique of Hegel s Philos ophy of by rights is the first major work w! here we can see the evident tendency towards Hegel s alienation . In this book he clear shows his ideas about religion in the following words reality makes religion religion does not make man .

In other words religion is the self-consciousness and self-feeling of man who has both not yet base himself or has already illogical himself . But man is no abstract being hunker down outside the world . Man is the world of man , the democracy , and company . This order , this society produces religion , a acetify world-consciousness because they are a reversed world . Religion is the marvelous idealization of the human shopping center because the human totality has no true reality (Marx , 1964 ,p . 41-42 . This argumentation along with umteen others shows what he actually thought about religion and its mathematical function in the society . He believes that religion is an intoxication that can give only a nearly timed(p) relief . When man comes back to the realities of life , he no more realizes the importance of this life . His idealistic attitude towards life makes him inactive and escaped , and an idle man has no organise in the state of communism . To him man is the founder of religion and his foundation is based on the reflection of life approximately him . He has applied his theory of communism on religion as well , in which he says that the greatest...If you want to micturate a total essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper